Skip to content Skip to footer

Should Nathen Barton Be Charged with Crimes? The Case for Criminal Prosecution.


It’s time to ask the serious question: Has Nathen Barton’s behavior crossed the line from civil nuisance into criminal activity? Let’s break down the evidence.

Knowingly Filing Frivolous Lawsuits: The TCPA requires plaintiffs to use their primary residential number. Barton has knowingly sued using at least five different numbers, most registered to other people. This is not an oversight; it’s a deliberate scheme to defraud the court and defendants.

Perjury and Misrepresentation: A judge has already ruled that Barton lied to the court. This is misconduct that strikes at the heart of the justice system.

Evidence of Impersonation: We have obtained information from legal sources that in at least one case, there are recordings of Barton impersonating another person to gather “evidence.” This could constitute identity theft or fraud.

In our opinion, Barton should be charged.

This is not just a civil matter anymore. His repeated, patterned actions—lying under oath, using deceptive practices, and potentially committing fraud—warrant criminal investigation.

If you have contacts in law enforcement, we urge you to bring this evidence to their attention:

Local Police & State Attorneys General: For fraud and perjury.

The Oregon State Bar: For his unauthorized practice of law through “TCPA University.”

The FBI: The TCPA is a federal law, and his multi-state operation could constitute wire fraud.

It’s time to stop just defending against his lawsuits. It’s time to hold him accountable.

Leave a comment